|
Chamber Building |
Continuing the approach of the Act, the Reform Act established the bankruptcy courts as adjunct courts of the United States district courts. The Commission's proposal for, new independent bankruptcy courts created under Article III of the Constitution proved to be politically impossible and was abandoned during the legislative process. However, the new bankruptcy courts were of substantially increased stature and expanded jurisdiction. Instead of being appointed by the district court judges for six-year terms, as was the case under the previous Act, bankruptcy judges were to be appointed by the President for fourteen-year terms with increased salary and staff support.
In a most significant change from prior law the new bankruptcy courts had expanded jurisdiction to hear all matters arising in bankruptcy cases. Under the previous Act the bankruptcy courts had authority to hear only matters within their summary jurisdiction once they were faced with a litigant's timely objection to jurisdiction. Disputes over summary and plenary (non-bankruptcy court) jurisdiction were time-consuming and often resulted in denial of effective relief to debtors or trustees on largely technical grounds. If the circuit court of the respective circuit so elected, appeals could be taken to a panel of three bankruptcy judges within the circuit rather than to the district court. The appeals from the panel, or from the district court if no panel is established, are to the circuit court. The Bankruptcy Reform Act of 1994 amended 28 USC 158 to provide for bankruptcy appellate panels in each circuit unless the circuit council opts out. The 1984 Amendments materially altered the court structure and jurisdiction of the bankruptcy courts. The bankruptcy courts are now a division of the district courts, hearing matters by general or specific reference from the district courts. Bankruptcy judges are appointed by the by the court of appeals for the circuit for fourteen year terms. Bankruptcy proceedings are divided into core proceedings which the bankruptcy judge may hear and determine and non-core proceedings which may be heard by the bankruptcy judge but are subject to de novo review by the district court. The jurisdictional and procedural aspects of the 1984 Amendments are discussed in Chapter 2.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Arrange Free Consult
Bankruptcy News